STANLEY KUBRICK is famous as a director of some of Hollywood’s more memorable and controversial films.
Among them: 2001: A Space Odyssey. A Clockwork Orange. Dr. Strangelove. Eyes Wide Shut. The Shining. Full Metal Jacket. Spartacus.
And one of my favorites: Paths of Glory.
But what many don’t know is that Kubrick was an accomplished photojournalist. In the summer of 1949, Look magazine sent him to Chicago for a photo shoot. Here are some of Kubrick’s photos from that assignment.
JUST SCAN THE SUBHEAD…and you know this is big mistake. Never ever put on a page anything you wouldn’t want your grandma (or your granddaughters!) to read.
Years ago, I was told this story:
An editor at a small weekly thought he was above having to work with correspondent columns. You know the type of column I’m talking about: the kind where the correspondent tells the story of Aunt Ima’s sister’s son’s daughter “coming over for a weekend from college to visit with Aunt Ima and they went to church together and then out to Bessie’s Blue Ridge Restaurant for breakfast with the family of Barry and Bunny Bixler and the Bixler boys and…” well, you get the idea. Real “down home” stuff that some editors hate but many readers love.
The frustrated editor was trying to make sense of the column but had to leave to cover another story. Before he did, he slapped a “for position only” headline on it that read:
What the f–k
is this all about?
He had planned to get back to editing the column as soon as he returned.
While the editor was gone, a prepress staffer cleared the page. Seems they were in a hurry to get the page finished with its pair on the plate.
Yes, the headline appeared in the paper that week. No, the editor wasn’t fired. Should he have been? I’m not sure.
Here’s are more details on this latest gaffe.
ACCORDING TO NATHAN MYHRVOLD, “…one of the saddest stories on Page 1 is about newspapers themselves.”
“All over the country,” Myhrvold says,”venerable old dailies are shedding reporters, editors and other workers.”
Myhrvold paints a dark picture for those “venerable old dailies.”
Trouble is, his report mentions: Seattle. Denver. Philadelphia. Minneapolis. The New York Times.
Well, we all know they’ve been having their problems.
But…check out the next post.
DURING A RECENT luncheon organized by the Ad Club of Toronto, Publisher John Cruickshank of the Toronto Star said: “I feel very optimistic about the long term for our news organizations…the best of times are ahead for the best of brands.
Cruickshank noted newspaper readership in Toronto has actually grown in recent years, thanks in part to free publications like Metro, which is partly owned by the Torstar Corp., which owns the Toronto Star.
Moderator Ken Whyte had asked the publishers to name the date at which they would cease printing a paper.
“I think the answer is never in our lifetime,” said Bill McDonald, publisher of Metro, comparing it to banks. They added automated machines, and now have expanded to online and mobile banking, yet tellers are still needed.
“It’s akin to us going from print to web to mobile. We’re all going to do it, but it doesn’t mean we’re going to close our branches and fire our tellers.”
Hmmm…makes me wonder if our Canadian brethren have managed to build a better business model over the years than those in (see previous post) Seattle. Denver. Philadelphia. Minneapolis. The New York Times.